Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
54
Highlights
33
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
Rode M2
vs
Shure BETA 87A:
54 Highlights & 33 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Find out if Rode's extras or Shure's live credentials better suit your recording setup.
We put Rode M2 and Shure BETA 87A head to head to see which microphone wins in performance, build, and price. Compare their features and product type, width, connection interface & onboard controls now.
Rode M2 vs Shure BETA 87A: A Detailed Comparison of Two Professional Condenser Microphones
If you are exploring professional condenser microphones suited for live, podcasting, and broadcast scenarios, the Rode M2 and Shure BETA 87A stand out as compelling options. Both microphones share core features like supercardioid polar patterns, studio-grade transformerless preamps, and XLR balanced connectivity with phantom power support at 48V. They are both designed as handheld condenser microphones aimed at unisex professional users and cover similar recording application categories, including live and studio use.
Nonetheless, these mics diverge in several fundamental ways. The Rode M2 offers a slightly wider frequency response, starting lower at 35 Hz and extending up to 20,000 Hz, while the Shure BETA 87A starts its range at 50 Hz. The M2 is known for its robust metal body with an internal shockmount, included shock mount accessory, pop filter, and windscreen, plus a longer 10-year warranty and various adapters within the box. Conversely, the BETA 87A boasts a lighter aluminum construction with corrosion resistance, detachable 25-foot cable, and renowned fast transient response tailored for clarity in vocal performance and broadcast reliability, but has a shorter 2-year warranty and no included shock mount.
Rode M2: Strength in Durability and Extended Frequency Range
What really makes the Rode M2 stand out is its comprehensive package and build geared toward professionals who seek reliability and accessory support. It features a metal body with an internal shockmount that helps significantly reduce handling noise; a thoughtful design choice for both studio and live applications. Its frequency response from 35 Hz to 20 kHz ensures fuller audio capture, especially enhancing low-end presence. The wide dynamic range of 118 dB, paired with a higher maximum sound pressure level at 141 dB SPL, accommodates diverse recording environments, including loud sources, without distortion.
Included in the package are a pop filter, shock mount, adapters, and a carrying case. These extras make the M2 a versatile choice for podcasters, video producers, and vocalists seeking robust protection and convenience without needing to buy additional gear. Its cable is non-detachable, emphasizing reliability over flexibility, and the device weighs 0.68 lbs with a compact form factor.
Moreover, the M2's 10-year warranty attests to Rode's confidence in build quality, providing users peace of mind for long-term usage and professional environments.
Shure BETA 87A: Precision and Lightweight Design for Broadcast Excellence
The Shure BETA 87A leans into a streamlined, aluminum-bodied design that is lighter at just 0.45 lbs compared to the M2. This makes it an excellent candidate for handheld use over extended periods, common in live performances and broadcast studios. With its electret condenser capsule and fast transient response, the BETA 87A excels at capturing vocal nuances with clarity and speed, ensuring each articulation is crisp and intelligible.
It features a slightly narrower frequency response starting from 50 Hz to 20 kHz, and importantly, comes with proximity effect control, which helps maintain vocal clarity when used close to the microphone.
One of the BETA 87A's perks is its use of detachable 25-foot cables, offering great flexibility for setup and replacement, especially in live or broadcast environments where cable wear and quick swapping can be a factor. The microphone also comes with cables and a protective foam insert as part of the package, catering to transport and protection needs.
Although it lacks an included shock mount, the BETA 87A's corrosion-resistant aluminum body and steel grill ensure durability on the road and in humid or challenging environments. Paired with a solid reputation for reliability in live venues and studios, it is a common choice for professionals prioritizing vocal-focused performance. However, its warranty period of only 2 years is notably shorter than the M2's.
Quick Take
The Rode M2 wins points with a sturdier metal body, extended low-frequency response starting at 35 Hz, and a comprehensive accessory bundle including a shock mount and pop filter. The Shure BETA 87A, however, shines with its lightweight aluminum frame, detachable cables, and fast transient response, perfect for broadcast and live vocal clarity. Both mics deliver superb studio-grade quality, but each caters to slightly different professional preferences.
Bottom Line
Ultimately, the Rode M2 offers excellent value and robust build for professionals wanting a complete solution with superior low-frequency response and trusted accessory support. It's ideal if you want a sturdy, well-rounded mic with extended warranty coverage. The Shure BETA 87A is the go-to if lighter weight, cable flexibility, and quick vocal articulation are your priorities, particularly in live or broadcast settings. Still, you'll pay a premium and trade off some accessory convenience.
Verdict
Winner: Rode M2 - for its durable metal housing, wider frequency range, richer accessory kit including shock mount, and outstanding 10-year warranty.
Runner-up: Shure BETA 87A - for its lightweight design, detachable cable system, and exceptional transient response ideal for live and broadcast vocals.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Is Rode M2 better than Shure BETA 87A? Depends on your playstyle. This deep microphones breakdown includes specs, feel, tone quality, and what musicians think.
42
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
PC, Mac, Mixer, Audio Interface, PA System
vs
Compatibility
Both Rode M2 and Shure BETA 87A are compatible with PC, Mac, and Audio Interfaces, but Shure expands support to Mixers and PA Systems, making it better for more complex audio setups.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
The Rode M2 is designed primarily for Live, Podcast, and Video Recording while the Shure BETA 87A targets Studio, Live, and Broadcast use, offering broader application versatility for the Shure.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Rode M2 suits Live and Podcast recording applications; Shure BETA 87A additionally supports studio and broadcast, making it a more versatile choice for professional environments.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
25
ft
0Votes
vs
Cable Length
Cable length is unspecified for M2, whereas BETA 87A includes a 25-foot cable, offering users extended reach out-of-the-box.
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
5.3
inch
0Votes
10
inch
0Votes
vs
Package Width
Package width for BETA 87A is almost double; 10 inches compared to M2's 5.3 inches, indicating a bigger shipping footprint.
The shipping package’s width.
In the battle of Package Width,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
4.7 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
0.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Capsule Diameter
M2’s capsule diameter is 0.5 inches; BETA 87A capsule diameter data is unavailable, though BETA 87A uses an electret capsule instead of M2's unspecified type.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
47
Rode M2
0Votes
5/8
90
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
5/8"
Shure BETA 87A
The 5/8-inch (15.9-mm) thread fits nearly all professional microphone stands. This standard size ensures compatibility across live and studio setups.
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
10.7
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Depth
Only M2 lists package depth at 10.7 inches; no comparable data for BETA 87A.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
3.2
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Package Height
M2 has a package height of 3.2 inches; BETA 87A's packaging height isn't specified.
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
I'm all about that frequency range and the Rode M2 starting at 35 Hz makes it more versatile for capturing deeper sounds. The Shure starts at 50 Hz which is a bit narrow, so I lean towards the Rode for richer audio.
When it comes to handling loud sound sources, the Rode M2's max SPL of 141 dB is impressive and means less distortion. The Shure's 140.5 dB is close but that slight edge with Rode gives me confidence for louder recordings.
Both are unidirectional with BETA 87A offering additional polar patterns including bidirectional and omnidirectional, providing more flexibility.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
87
Rode M2
0Votes
Studio-Grade
80
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Studio-Grade
vs
Internal Preamp Quality
Both microphones feature studio-grade internal preamps ensuring quality audio capture for professional use.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
In the battle of Internal Preamp Quality,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
77
Rode M2
0Votes
Transformerless
90
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Transformerless
Shure BETA 87A
The transformerless circuit provides a clean, transparent output with low distortion. This design ensures detailed audio capture and minimal coloration.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transformer/Transformerless Design on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
77
Rode M2
0Votes
Condenser
60
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Condenser
vs
Microphone Type
As condensers with pressure gradient principles, both models deliver clarity; however, BETA 87A’s electret capsule offers a distinct sonic profile unlike the M2.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Electret
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
17
Rode M2
0Votes
Mono
20
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Mono
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
67
Rode M2
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
70
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
In the battle of Acoustic Principle,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
90
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Fast
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
Yes
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Not being able to detach the cable on the Rode M2 is a downside for me, especially on the road. Shure's detachable 25-foot cable is super convenient and feels like a better fit for live setups, so I gotta give it to the BETA 87A here.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
14 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
87
Rode M2
0Votes
Analog
40
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Balanced
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Output Capability
Does it have dual output capability?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Output Capability on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
88
Rode M2
0Votes
Standard
90
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Standard
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
In the battle of XLR Pin Configuration,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom power support is standard on both but I like that both mics require 48V which fits most professional setups. So no preference here, both Rode and Shure are spot on.
See more
Power Source
What is the power source?
80
Rode M2
0Votes
Phantom
70
Shure BETA 87A
0Votes
Phantom Power
Rode M2
Requires phantom power to operate, which is supplied by most professional audio interfaces. This ensures consistent and clean audio capture without batteries.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What is the battery type?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The type of battery used if portable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light
Does it have a power indicator light?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Features a built-in switch for quick activation or muting. This is convenient for live performances or sudden recording pauses.
Shure BETA 87A
The standard model does not include an on/off switch, keeping the design simple for stage reliability. Performers won’t have to worry about accidentally turning the mic off mid-show.
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Neither mic has a mute function which surprises me, but it seems to highlight simplicity. I guess neither is better here, so I'm neutral but slightly prefer Rode as it has a shock mount to reduce noise.
See more
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Control on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
The metal body on the Rode M2 just feels more rugged and ready for any situation compared to the aluminum on the Shure. I value that solid build quality and durability, so Rode wins out for me on this spec.
The carrying case from Rode M2 is a nice touch and it adds to the package value. With Shure also having one but no shock mount included, I lean towards Rode's more complete accessory bundle for convenience.
The Beta 87A normally ships without a cable, though some bundles include one. Always check your package contents so you have the right XLR cable ready for use.
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables,
Rode M2 ◉ is
worse than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cables on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Backed by a 10-year warranty, reflecting the manufacturer’s confidence in durability. This provides long-term peace of mind for professional use.
Shure BETA 87A
Shure provides a 2-year warranty for added peace of mind. This coverage reflects the brand’s confidence in its build quality and long-term reliability.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
8.0 years
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
Rode M2 ◉ is
better than
Shure BETA 87A ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Advanced Features
15
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No
1Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Based on community votes for Multi-Pattern Switching,
Rode M2 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Shure BETA 87A ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Neither mic supports multi-pattern switching which is fine for handheld use. Still, I like Rode's internal shockmount for handling better though feature-wise they tie on this.
See more
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Tracking on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode
Does it support surround capture?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Low Latency Monitoring
Does it support low-latency monitoring?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows?
0Votes
Rode M2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Assistant Compatibility on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
Rode M2
No
0Votes
Shure BETA 87A
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
Rode M2 ◉ is
same as
Shure BETA 87A ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on Rode M2 ◉
vs Shure BETA 87A ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
